Cloud Computing

Idris Drief

Cloud Computing has been around since the mid 2000’s but has really grown in popularity in recent years as businesses seek to simplify maintenance, reduce physical footprint (pay as you go “PAYG”, capital expense converted to operational expense) and operate on a more resilient, reliable and cost-effective infrastructure.  Cloud is a compelling paradigm due to the explosion in the number of available data sources, whether they are purchased from data vendors or procured by web scraping. Asset managers are consuming alternative data at an ever-greater rate to derive valuable insight that shape and support their investment strategies.

Value proposition

There are many ways that a cloud strategy can help create value for organisations that do not wish to invest heavily in on-premises infrastructure or support large IT functions.

The elasticity that cloud offers means that it’s easier than ever to scale up/down server specs to align with the needs of the business. Many large providers (Microsoft, Amazon and Google) offer a full set of services to cover all necessary considerations of an enterprise architecture, making them truly turnkey and quick to market. Cloud platforms include data security services to provide user authentication, authorization and data encryption resilience and high availability out-of-the box, as well as, allowing automation of security operations such as taking servers offline. Cloud also offers resilience during disaster recovery scenarios by replicating data and services across high availability zones.

Cloud services and PAYG pricing models means that firms only need to pay for the computing power and storage they need. This has resulted in a big data analytics boom, where it is now possible to use elastic data warehouses that shrink and grow on-demand to execute complex, time costly analytical operations across vast and diverse datasets with ease.

In data analytics, most of the upfront work involves wrangling, cleansing and normalizing data from a variety of sources. Cloud can help break down silos where these activities happen and instead perform them transparently in a distributed fashion and make the results accessible to users across the organization. Cloud platforms being accessible via the internet by their very nature also means that analytics is now more mobile than ever.

As these platforms keep maturing, providers are investing billions into new services in data processing, analytics, compliance and security with new features and services rolled out on a monthly basis.  The value of this is significant since the investments are done once but can be taken advantage under the PAYG model.

Investment in Alternative Data

Once a platform is set up in the cloud, the possibilities for asset managers to source alternative data greatly expands, while the cost can decrease. This is especially important right now, as alternative data become more mainstream. As reported by the Financial Times, forecasts that overall expenditure by asset managers on alternative datasets and employees to parse the data will climb to over US $1bn by 2020. Moreover, “Opimas, a consultancy, estimates that investors are spending about $5bn a year on alternative data, and expect the industry to grow 30 per cent annually in the coming years.” [1]

With this rising trend, there are many sources of alternative data that are being used in predictive modelling:

The quality of the data can vary considerably, but the most reliable and insightful sources tend to be consumer related (credit/debit card usage) and web data (traffic), with social media and sentiment data providers being most prevalent. Social media is a particularly sensitive area, given the privacy concerns and potential to inadvertently obtain non-public information.

Lowenstein Sandler’s recent survey of hedge funds “reported a number of concerns, primarily related to cost and quality. Other worries included possible data security and privacy issues and the risk of acquiring material nonpublic information.” [2]

Regulatory Pressures

Financial services have generally been slower to move to fully virtualized environments due in part to jurisdictional and data sensitivity and privacy concerns. This has necessitated the use of virtual private clouds (“VPCs”) which are single tenant and can be located in a specific geography.  VPCs are different to public clouds which are multi-tenanted and distributed across the globe. The pace at which the industry adopts virtual technology has also prompted many to adopt a hybrid approach, where business critical systems and sensitive data remain on premises to provide greater control and satisfy data residency, sovereignty and localized compliance.

Whilst the General Data Protection Regulation was introduced to bring uniformity to laws governing data privacy and protection for all European Union (“EU”) member states, one of the biggest challenges outside the EU is in knowing which laws apply within each region, especially if they are clustered together to offer even more resiliency than before. Selection of regions is a critical part of determining how to migrate to the cloud, and establishing the correct terms and conditions with the cloud provider is essential to mitigate against breached privacy commitments.  Good data lineage, cataloging and leveraging metadata to keep track of how data flows through your organization is also key.


  • Cloud infrastructure can provide greater reliability, resilience, security and controls when compared to on-premises infrastructure.
  • Analytics can be performed in the cloud more affordably on larger datasets.
  • Proof of concepts can be built very fast to evaluate new technologies and processes.
  • VPCs allow for good separation of systems and environments such as development, User Acceptance Testing (“UAT”) and production allowing true segregation of functions and controls.
  • The barriers to cloud entry have come down with competition between the big providers and the availability of open source tools.
  • A wide variety of alternative datasets are readily available for purchase from data vendors.
  • Asset managers and service providers must navigate complex regulatory requirements with the true implications and associated costs of compliance only now starting to become known.


[1] Financial Times: Asset managers double spending on new data in hunt for edge, Robin Wigglesworth, May 8, 2018
[2] Institutional Investor: Hedge Funds Plan to Pour More Money Into Alternative Data, Amy Whyte, September 11, 2019.

MUFG Investor Services’s Daniel Trentacosta recently spoke with Alice Murray of The Drawdown about why now is a great time for GPs to revisit tech infrastructure upgrade projects put on hold by Covid-19. 

How are people growing and cultivating their network during this difficult time?

As the restrictions start to ease in parts of the world, will we see normalcy when it comes to networking, or will it remain virtual? Charina Amunategui, Executive Director at MUFG Investor Services, joins the podcast to discuss her thoughts and provide best practices. 

By Cliodhna Murphy

View original article

In the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis (“GFC”), the requirements for transparency, control and customization across entire investment programs became all the more apparent.  Amidst the call for these industry changes, separately managed accounts (“SMAs”) became a popular portfolio structure that offered investors many of the freedoms they were looking for. In parallel, consideration of environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) factors has become a mainstream topic of investment discussions across the world, and responsible investment practices and evaluation criteria have had an increasing influence on how investment decisions are made.

Now, as we navigate the COVID-19 pandemic and the current crisis both inside and out of the financial sector, it is worth reflecting on the factors which have driven the increased popularity of SMAs and exploring whether these vehicles could see a rise in popularity as a means of accessing ESG strategies.  Through examining these factors, we can explore whether the demand for these vehicles may be impacted by COVID-19 and whether SMAs could become the structures of choice for ESG-savvy investors.


As calls for greater transparency mount, partly as a result of the natural evolution of the market and partly as a reaction to events, technology has kept up with growing demand.  Full transparency of position-level data for alternative investments has historically been costly and cumbersome. However, there are now cost-effective technology solutions to efficiently process the extra data that arises as a result of the demand for full transparency.  By carefully managing the complex additional data, risk management and performance analytics are strengthened, which can help with both portfolio construction and ongoing monitoring.

Transparency is crucial for investors who are looking to measure ESG considerations across their entire portfolio.  To date, there has been a marked focus on ESG considerations within publicly listed companies, while private markets currently lag behind.  However, for effective ESG scoring across an overall portfolio composition, allocations to alternative assets cannot be ignored.   

We continue to see methods for collating ESG data evolve and improve, as greater collaboration sets clearer standards and definitions, and concerted efforts by all parties across the investment ecosystem drive positive change. But none of these factors can be monitored or measured by investors without underlying transparency on what exposures their portfolios are taking. Because of this, investors are likely to gravitate towards more transparent investment vehicles such as SMAs to continue holding themselves to the high standards they look for in the companies in which they invest.


SMA structures offer a number of important control features that are not available through the use of commingled investments.  First, they are by definition segregated, thereby removing co-investment risk and increasing oversight. Legal ownership of the assets in an SMA rests with the single SMA investor, so these structures offer significantly higher protection than commingled vehicles in the event of a default.

Particularly of interest for investors who are looking to apply ESG criteria is the ability for investment guidelines to be customized using SMA structures. Investors also have greater control over the liquidity of the underlying assets within SMA structures and can pivot more easily between lending and borrowing, which is especially important during periods of market stress.

These characteristics helped propel SMA structures into the limelight post-GFC and may do so again following the COVID-19 related market volatility we have seen in this year.

One of the key reasons SMAs saw so much interest post-GFC was their ability to individually tailor liquidity terms for each portfolio.  The process of setting up and customizing an SMA often brings managers and investors closer together and leads to more frequent and meaningful dialogs. Coupled with the additional transparency that SMAs offers, this expanded communication often leads to allocations that tend to be longer-lasting.  Therefore, although liquidity terms may allow for swifter exits, in practice this isn’t always the case.


As we continue to navigate the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, investors are likely to call for more transparency, control and customization, and to continue the drive towards responsible investing.  Fund managers eager to successfully seize new opportunities will be ready to meet these demands.

SMAs deliver the required features and allow investors to design their own ESG bespoke products, which can be independently monitored at a position level.  Asset servicers play a valuable role to help collect and collate information from private firms to help both investors and managers make more informed, responsible investment decisions. 

The full effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on global markets is still unclear, however there are some early indications that ESG indices have outperformed their peers as highlighted by MSCI (blog) and that ESG funds have not suffered the same outflows (Schroders).  Although it is too early to effectively draw a meaningful conclusion, given how society has responded to previous socially and environmentally impactful events, investors and fund managers should expect to continue to see responsible investment becoming the norm.

MUFG Investor Services podcast episode 1

Tim Smollen, Global Head of the Global Securities Lending Solutions Group at MUFG and Paul Collard, Global Head of Trading for EMEA and APAC join the podcast to provide their insights on one of the most volatile quarters and months ever seen in the securities lending/repo/financing markets as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.